IRVKN
17. ನಾನು ಹೇಳಬಯಸುವುದೇನೆಂದರೆ, ದೇವರು ಮೊದಲು ಅನುಮೋದಿಸಿದ ಒಡಂಬಡಿಕೆಯನ್ನು, [* ವಿಮೋ 12:40,41; ಆದಿ 15:13; ಅ. ಕೃ. 7:6] ನಾನೂರ ಮೂವತ್ತು ವರ್ಷಗಳ ನಂತರ ಬಂದ ಮೋಶೆಯ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಅದನ್ನು ನಿರರ್ಥಕಗೊಳಿಸಿ, ಆ ವಾಗ್ದಾನವನ್ನು ಬರಿದಾಗಿಮಾಡಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿಲ್ಲ.

KNV
17. ನಾನು ಹೇಳುವದೇನಂದರೆ, ದೇವರು ಕ್ರಿಸ್ತನಲ್ಲಿ ಮೊದಲು ಸ್ಥಿರಪಡಿಸಿದ ಒಡಂಬಡಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ನಾನೂರ ಮೂವತ್ತು ವರುಷಗಳ ಮೇಲೆ ಬಂದ ನ್ಯಾಯಪ್ರಮಾಣವು ರದ್ದು ಮಾಡಿ ಆ ವಾಗ್ದಾನವನ್ನು ವ್ಯರ್ಥಮಾಡುವದಿಲ್ಲ.

ERVKN
17. ನಾನು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಿರುವುದೇನೆಂದರೆ, ದೇವರು ಅಬ್ರಹಾಮನೊಂದಿಗೆ ಒಂದು ಒಡಂಬಡಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ಮಾಡಿಕೊಂಡು ಅದನ್ನು ಸ್ಥಿರಪಡಿಸಿದನು. ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ ನಾನೂರಮೂವತ್ತು ವರ್ಷಗಳಾದ ನಂತರ ಬಂದ ಧರ್ಮಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವು ಅಬ್ರಹಾಮನಿಗೆ ದೇವರು ಮಾಡಿದ ವಾಗ್ದಾನವನ್ನು ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸುವುದೂ ಇಲ್ಲ ಬದಲಾಯಿಸುವುದೂ ಇಲ್ಲ.

OCVKN



KJV
17. And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

AMP
17. This is my argument: The Law, which began 430 years after the covenant [concerning the coming Messiah], does not and cannot annul the covenant previously established (ratified) by God, so as to abolish the promise and make it void. [Exod. 12:40.]

KJVP
17. And G1161 CONJ this G5124 D-ASN I say G3004 V-PAI-1S , [ that ] the covenant G1242 N-ASF , that was confirmed before G4300 V-RPP-ASF of G3588 T-GSM God G2316 N-GSM in G1519 PREP Christ G5547 N-ASM , the G3588 T-GSM law G3551 N-NSM , which was G1096 V-2RAP-NSM four hundred G5071 A-APN and G2532 CONJ thirty G5144 A-NUI years G2094 N-APN after G3326 PREP , cannot disannul G208 V-PAI-3S , that it should make the promise of none effect G2673 V-AAN .

YLT
17. and this I say, A covenant confirmed before by God to Christ, the law, that came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not set aside, to make void the promise,

ASV
17. Now this I say: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.

WEB
17. Now I say this. A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.

NASB
17. This is what I mean: the law, which came four hundred and thirty years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to cancel the promise.

ESV
17. This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void.

RV
17. Now this I say; A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.

RSV
17. This is what I mean: the law, which came four hundred and thirty years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void.

NKJV
17. And this I say, [that] the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect.

MKJV
17. And I say this, A covenant having been ratified by God in Christ, the Law (coming into being four hundred and thirty years after) does not annul the promise, so as to abolish it.

AKJV
17. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot cancel, that it should make the promise of none effect.

NRSV
17. My point is this: the law, which came four hundred thirty years later, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.

NIV
17. What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.

NIRV
17. Here is what I mean. The law came 430 years after the promise. But the law does not get rid of God's covenant and promise. The covenant had already been made by God. So the law does not do away with the promise.

NLT
17. This is what I am trying to say: The agreement God made with Abraham could not be canceled 430 years later when God gave the law to Moses. God would be breaking his promise.

MSG
17. This is the way I interpret this: A will, earlier ratified by God, is not annulled by an addendum attached 430 years later, thereby negating the promise of the will.

GNB
17. What I mean is that God made a covenant with Abraham and promised to keep it. The Law, which was given four hundred and thirty years later, cannot break that covenant and cancel God's promise.

NET
17. What I am saying is this: The law that came four hundred thirty years later does not cancel a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to invalidate the promise.

ERVEN
17. This is what I mean: The agreement that God gave to Abraham was made official long before the law came. The law came 430 years later. So the law could not take away the agreement and change God's promise.